Hunter Law

  • Home
  • About
    • Support Team
  • Blog
  • Testimonials
  • Contact
  • Newsletter Sign Up
You are here: Home / Blog / Be considerate: Comments about accents can be harassment

January 2025

Be considerate: Comments about accents can be harassment

A recent Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) case has highlighted that making comments about someone’s accent, such as saying it’s hard to understand, can be considered unlawful racial harassment.

Carozzi v University of Hertfordshire

In Carozzi v University of Hertfordshire, an employee accused her employer  of several types of discrimination and harassment. Some of her claims focused on comments made about her strong Brazilian accent. Initially, the tribunal dismissed all her claims, but, she appealed, arguing that she had faced discrimination for the following reasons:

  • Accent and Ethnic Origin
    The comments about her accent were connected to her ethnic origin (Brazilian), even if those making the comments weren’t influenced by her ethnicity when they made the comments.
  • Victimisation
    Her employer refused to share meeting notes because they worried she might use it to make a discrimination claim.

The law in the UK  protects employees from being treated less favourably if they raise concerns about potential discrimination. The tribunal had dismissed this claim on the basis that the employer would have withheld the document if they had been worried that the employee might make another legal claim (one which was not for discrimination) so there was no less favourable treatment. The Claimant argued that this was wrong.

The EAT disagreed with the tribunal

Upon review, the EAT agreed with the employee and allowed her appeal. They determined:

  • Accent and race are linked
    The EAT clarified that comments about someone’s accent can be ‘related to’ their ethnic origin – it doesn’t matter if the person making the comment wasn’t influenced by their ethnic origin in making the comments.
  • Refusing to share documents can be victimisation
    If an employer refuses to share a document because they fear it might be used in a discrimination case, this could count as victimisation. The EAT said the tribunal was wrong to dismiss this claim, the real question was whether the refusal to provide the notes was influenced, at least partly, by concerns about a possible discrimination complaint.

Lessons for employers and HR professionals ?

  • Take the time and effort to  educate your employees about discrimination.  We all need to be cautious and respectful about comments on accents—they can easily cross the line into harassment, especially if the accent is tied to a person’s race or nationality.
  • Transparency is important. Withholding documents out of fear they might lead to legal claims can lead to victimisation complaints.

If you enjoyed this blog then perhaps you’d like to sign up to our monthly newsletter. We’ll keep you updated on what’s new in employment law.

The team at Hunter Law is here for you. We can handle your HR issues, finesse your policies, and keep you up-to-date on evolving legislation. Please get in touch with our legal team, we’d love to help.

Newsletter Sign Up

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: Newsletter January 2025

Hunter Law

1 Tonbridge Road
Maidstone
Kent
ME16 8RL

Tel: 01622 663355
Email: info@hunterlaw.uk

Discrimination Law Association logo

Discrimination Law Association Member

Solicitors Regulation Authority logo

Solicitors Regulation Authority

SRA Verification

Pricing information and complaints procedure

Defending employment tribunals – pricing and service information

Our Complaints Procedure

Privacy Notice

Privacy Notice

Copyright © 2025 Hunter Law

Hunter Law Limited is registered in England and Wales with registered company number 10336680.
Registered office: 2nd Floor, Medway Bridge House, 1-8 Fairmeadow, Maidstone, Kent, ME14 1JP.
We are also an authorised body regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (authorisation number 634003).
Our professional rules may be accessed at Code of Conduct.